|
- TOXINS IN COSMETICS
One of the things that I'll be spearheading soon is a discussion with leading
cosmetics companies about the toxins presently residing in cosmetics. Thousands
of concerned students at major universities across the country have reached
out and asked me to help them convince cosmetic companies to remove the
dangerous ingredients.
We will ask them to conform to the European Union standards
where most of the toxins are banned.
The only way they'll listen to us is if we present a united
front. Currently, I have a little over 200,000 people signed up to this
newsletter. I'd like to get it to 1 million before I approach the cosmetic
companies.
If each of you forward this email to 5 people and ask them to
sign up to our newsletter, we can accomplish this.
If you already receive our newsletters there's no reason to sign
up again.
Forward this to 5 people with a note asking them to join our
email list so we can once again try to make the world a safer place for women
to live.
New people sign up by forwarding your email address to:
Sign
up for our Newsletter Here:
OPRAH - PLEASE DISCUSS THIS
Yesterday I received an email from an esteemed member of the
eating disorders community telling me about a new show scheduled to air on
The Oprah Winfrey Network called "Inside Rehab." This new show
takes place inside of a residential eating disorder facility.
The woman that sent the email to me was very concerned and asked
if I would get the word out to the eating disorders community.
Here is the initial email that I received:
Ok, so as you all may have heard, the Oprah network is trying to
air a show that will be a reality show inside an inpatient eating disorder
clinic.
I am sure I do not have to explain why I and so many people
think this is such a horrible idea. There is a Facebook group call just
say no to "inside rehab" and below it explains what they are trying
to accomplish. On the page there are links to the Oprah network email,
the Oprah email, and emails for the people who are on the legislature of this
group. If you could, forward this to anybody who would be able to help
stop this or whatever you can do would be great!
Thanks so much.
XXXXX
This is potentially so dangerous that I hope Oprah reaches out
to some of the leaders of the Eating Disorder Community to discuss the
ramifications of airing a show like this.
Yesterday, I found this excerpt from an article on Jezebel.com
about the show:
Though it hasn't been announced which hospital Oprah (who, by
the way, is absolutely a terrible role model in terms of having a healthy
attitude towards weight and body image, as she consistently yo-yo diets and
even goes so far as to note her "embarrassment" over weight gain)
will be filming at, I'd like to know which ED recovery program thinks it's a
super-great idea to film active eating disorder patients in the recovery
process so that their pre and post recovery bodies will be on film for the
entire universe to see, because I honestly can't think of anything more
triggering for someone just out of recovery than seeing one's body morph over
the recovery period.
Here is the full article on Jezebel.com:
Article about Oprah's New
Show
After doing some research on "Inside Rehab," one of
the things that sounds a little frightening to me is a feature they're
planning called "vote for your favorite patient." Doesn't
that inherently put the eating disorder patients in competition with each
other?
Other than that I don't know much about the show, but below I've
included links to the email addresses of Oprah's staff and The Oprah Winfrey
Network in case you want to send your comments about the new show.
Remember there is strength in numbers. If 1,000,000 of you write
Oprah expressing your concerns about the new show, it probably won't air.
Here are comments from people about "Inside Rehab" and
Oprah that I found:
BTW, today's (5/12) show is on "Never Diet Again!"
Although focused on a book by Geneen Roth, known for her advocacy of ED
recovery, it is touted as "the miracle you've been waiting for" if
you're "tired of being fat and overweight." Oprah has bought into
the whole fad industry, and she is taking what could be a huge step in the
roadblocks of making peace with food, she turns it into a commercialized
gimmick that will likely quickly lose credibility because it is not getting
the respect it deserves.
-------------------------------------------------
I have her on right now just to she's acting like a hipocrate. I
just changed the channel. I have and am losing a lot of respect for Oprah.
This all just saddens my heart. I think she should know better; of course
this is just my opion.
-------------------------------------------------
The weird world of illness..not entertainment! I find that
totally insulting! The show has sunk that low as to calling people who are
suffering with ED weird. Have they ran out of things to talk about. I'M
PISSED!
------------------------------------------------
Please contact me -- I have more details on this program, such
as a "vote for your favorite patient" feature...are you kidding me?
We need to get serious, please email me. I have other influential ED leaders
ready to back us.
----------------------------------------------------
"Inside Rehab" is a reckless idea in the name of high
drama -- and the almighty dollar that drama tends to attract. It is easy to
be outraged about this program, but we also must direct some of that outrage
toward the society (our society) that so readily eats this kind of thing up.
(Okay, that pun was sort of intended.) Has someone already suggested a letter
writing (or email) campaign directed to OW's network? Thanks.
-----------------------------------------------------
Write Oprah and voice your concerns here:
Write Oprah
Write the Oprah Winfrey Network to voice your concerns here:
Write the Oprah Winfrey
Network
- LINDEN OAKS CANDLELIGHT VIGIL
On Monday night I attended the Candlelight Vigil at Linden Oaks
Hospital in support of girls that have passed away or are currently
struggling with an eating disorder.
600 people attended the event and I spoke during the ceremony
along with Nicole Pollard, Miss Indiana 2009 and several parents that lost
daughters to an eating disorder.
Everyone lit a candle in support of the wonderful girls that
have recently passed.
Nicole Pollard, Miss Indiana 2009, an eating disorder survivor
herself, gave words of encouragement.
I told the story of a young woman that I interviewed last
Saturday that was pulled out of treatment after 81 days by her insurance
company.
The insurance company said she was well enough to function at
home even thought the treatment facility informed them that she was still
very sick. Unless she gets help soon, her family is afraid that she'll die.
I announced that I was going to investigate these insurance
companies and show how they're part of the problem in my new film.
The next morning I received 87 emails from parents supporting me for
attempting to hold insurance companies liable.
Here are a couple of the emails:
Hello,
I was at the vigil at Linden Oaks on Monday, 5/17-I listened to
Darryl regarding the insurance ignorance of this devastating disease.We have
fought our insurance twice and will be now fighting again the third time any
day now. Our daughter is at Arabella at this time and my other two daughters
have been fighting the disorder in a more milder tone and have recovered.
It's been grueling; and I WANT TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN FAMILIES LIVES
REGARDING THE INSURANCE ILLITERACY OF THIS SUBJECT. I would very much like to
be a part of this battle and would do anything to help win the war of
insurance companies not understanding the importance of full recovery
assistance. Please contact me and I will help win the war with you. My
daughter XXXXX also spoke with Darryl the night of the Vigil at Linden Oaks;
she too suffered and she is willing to help fight the battle, she writes and
sings beautifully the words that so many females/males are suffering. Thank
you
----------------------------------------------------------
I saw Darryl last night at Linden Oaks Hospital. My daughter
XXXXXX was recently discharged from Arabella House. I am appealing with our
insurance and am appalled at their response. Please contact me for details.
--------------------------------------------------------
Nicole and I are moving forward with our plans for a website
that salutes companies that are doing a great job with providing safe
products for women.
If you know of a cosmetics line, clothing company, household
goods company, etc. committed to selling safe (toxic free) products to women
let me know and I'll include them on the website that we're launching soon.
After-all, it only makes sense to reward and support companies
dedicated to doing the right thing.
- DVD COVER REACTIONS
Last week I showed you the new cover that the DVD company was
proposing to use to sell "America the Beautiful" when it hits stores
this summer.
41,236 of you emailed me your comments. That's pretty
significant because it represents 20% of the people signed on to this
newsletter. I've never had this kind of feedback from you.
I forwarded your comments to the DVD distributor and I'll let
you know soon what their final decision is.
Here are some of your comments. I couldn't include all 41,000 of
them because my hand started hurting cutting and pasting, cutting and
pasting.
Thanks for your support and here are some randomly selected
comments:
----------------------------------------------------------
The DVD cover they designed for you will trigger EVERY eating
disorder patient I work with to restrict or purge! Their bodies look almost
perfect like the cover and they have all those thoughts about needing to
change it.
------------------------------------------------------------
Hey Darryl:
I'm so happy that you're taking this potential new image on the
cover of America the Beautiful so seriously! Kudos to you for not
wanting to damage or hurt any woman or child (or man, I presume). As
for the artwork on America the Beautiful, I don't LOVE the Statue of Liberty
image (or necessarily see the connections between what you said you think she
represents). However, I do think it's a good cover for the film,
especially because of it's title AMERICA the Beautiful. For that
reason, I'd be hesitant to change it to a stock model.
I do see the DVD company's point about how the new image is
satirical, and that feels legitimate to me--although the change is still
unnecessary. Quite frankly, the new image does make the DVD
"pop" off the shelf and is probably a little more attractive and
appealing than the Statue of Liberty cover, but it feels like a
compromise. Even though the image is satirical and ironic, you're using
this beautiful woman just to sell more DVDs.
If I didn't know what the movie was about, I'd probably buy the
stock-model DVD over the Statue-of-Liberty DVD. BUT, since I DO know
what the movie is about, I'm PROUD TO OWN THE STATUE-OF-LIBERTY DVD!!!!
All that to say, I can see both points of view, but I respect yours
more. I guess this is not much help to you, but I wouldn't sweat it too
much. Maybe they can go back to the drawing board and come up with
something else entirely--maybe a liposuctioned
tomato!
------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Darryl,
Ever since I met you at the Eating Disorders Coalition briefing
on Capitol Hill in fall 2008 and saw the documentary for the first time I
have been a big fan of the film and of you. I think the work you have
done to empower American women is outstanding! As a male feminist working in
the body image and eating disorders field I'm always a believer that we need
people who are the least connected to a subject to be the champions so that
they can relate it to people who are not connected or interested. Given
the false stereotype that eating disorders are a "choice that affect blonde
white young girls from California" it is great to have an advocate that
is an older African American male out there pointing out that body image and
eating disorders affect females (and males) of all ethnic groups and
ages! Our screening here in February was very well received by a
diverse audience of males and females and we have two copies of ATB for
students to watch in our Wellness Center.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Darryl,
Here's my thought on the proposed change to the America The
Beautiful cover: No. Freaking. Way.
The original Statue of Liberty cover lets you know right off the
bat what you're looking at. The proposed new cover could be anything. It
could be an exercise program, a how-to on Photoshop, a promo for cosmetic
surgery, or even a pornographic film.
If the powers that be are really that determined to change the
cover, then my suggestion would be to change the American Icon in question.
The Statue of Liberty is the perfect image to my mind, but I would be satisfied
with something like, say, Rosie the Riveter. The thing that simply does not
work is to take an already anonymous, airbrushed, fill-in-the-blanks random
model and put those notes on her. That's business as usual. Your film is
anything but business as usual. Nobody who would want to see your film will
be attracted to it by the suggested image, and many who would want to hear
your message would either never notice this cover on the shelves, or pass by
it assuming that it isn't what you intended to say.
Even changing the cover to someone like Marilyn Monroe would get
the message across better than the one they put together.
Please, please, please continue to fight this appalling cover.
It's a travesty of everything the film stands for.
-------------------------------------------------------------
OMG, Darryl!
It's the DVD company that's out of touch - and missing the point
completely !! Where's their originality? They phoned in that
ordinary copy. It was probably cut and pasted from ANY of several
gazillion other ads/tv shows. That blonde may represent AdAmerica; she
doesn't represent the real America. But the Statue of Liberty does -
and drives home the important message in mega numbers. And why would
Blockbusters be considered an authority on this level of film - their
mentality is that of the boring repetitive covers on the cheapie romance
novels. With apologies to Barbara Cartland (not her real name).
I'm way more steamed about this, but have to run to an
appointment. I have more to say, and will ask you for names and
addresses. I'll be at the Vigil on Monday. So glad you're such a
staunch supporter for this issue - rather, ISSUE, as there are so many issues
contained in this ISSUE !!!!
Keep up the Good Fight. I'm in your corner for sure - for
my Granddaughters and all the women in the world.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Darryl,
Your message is lost without the Statue of Liberty. The
subtle layers of meanings perhaps go way beyond what Blockbuster is capable
of imagining. America the Beautiful was written by a graduate of and
professor at my college, Wellesley, an all women's college and the alma mater
of our current SOS whose job it is to smooth connections with other
countries, one of the many goals that France's lovely statue achieved
centuries ago. By setting aside the "dumb white blonde" and
picking up on a creature whose words welcome all races you voided out the
confusion that this is a disease that only befalls one ethnic group.
Moreover, the "dumb blonde" idea obfuscates the issue....and how
could anyone not make the connection?
Stick by your guns.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Darryl,
I am one of 6 women in at eating disorder group for women who
together watched your film, laughed, cried and fell silent at many of the
aspects of this subject you touch on. I have been severly bulimic for
over 18 years and after I watched your film at the group, I bought the film
and have since seen it over 10 times. I show it to all I know and each
time I watch it, for those 2 hours, I know in my heart how beautiful I
am. You expose what a trick everything around us is that is what
these companies who are trying to convince you to change the film are
doing...trick you too. Please don't give in.... I know it my be worth a
few more quick dollars in the end (because that is the world we live now) but
your film is changing people and the world bit by bit...maybe not with money,
but with what each moment of your film represents. I support and
respect your stand to the companies and if I can do anything to help, I
will....Thank you for giving something to the world that is literally saving
lives. Each two-hour block of time that I lay my own eyes on the film,
I know a little piece of mine is saved.
Keep up the good work
--------------------------------------------------------------
Hi there. I have a suggestion for the DVD artwork. What about a
compromise? So, they don't like the Statue of Liberty design. They don't
"get it." They don't think it will "work" on
middle-America... Whatever. The photo of the model is absurd for the DVD
cover - it's the opposite of the image you want to convey as the
"point" of the movie. So, what about a cartoon? A cartoon of a
woman with all the notes about her figure and her appearance?
Just an idea.
Best of luck in your endeavors.
------------------------------------------------------------
OK, they don't want the Statue of Liberty - How about
using some epic piece of artwork like the Statue of David or the Mona Lisa
and making suggestions on how we could make that piece of art to look better
- more "Americanized?" Just a thought which is probably as crazy as
Hollywood's. Maybe Darryl should get Ralph Lauren's permission to use a photo
of Ralph - LOL ;~)
------------------------------------------------------------
Darryl you are a hero to all!!
-------------------------------------------------------------
I completely agree that the newly revised cover concept is a
problem. While it may be true that it will catch the eyes of people who are
obsessed with physical/cultural beauty, I feel...
It is making a break with a pretty well-established brand and
will lose customer loyalty and/or create consumer confusion;
It has homogenized the art to a point that it has lost it's
interest and uniqueness
It is completely anti-thetical to the core message.
As to your sales/marketing guy's comment:
4) The new art better utilizes the great satirical
concept at the center of your original idea...i.e. that the fashion
(etc.) industries make money by criticizing that which is
essentially flawless. The woman on the box is a standard beauty, but
the fasionista making the notes is essentially saying that she is ugly.
Isn't this at the core of your film? I think the essential message was
confused by the use of the Statue of Liberty, whose beauty is symbolic, not
literal.
The whole reason the Statue of Liberty worked is because when we
look at that image we are reminded of what really matters - Ms. Liberty
stands for freedom, for justice, for the beauty of character, which is why
the juxtaposition of various "change this/add that" language
surrounding her is so jarring and intriguing. Like, "Why would we mess with
something so beautiful at it's core just so it could look like what we think
every woman should look like?". To put a "standard beauty" on
the cover and then add all of that completely misses the point, and loses the
intelligence of the original concept. Additionally, even if you were to keep
the new art, they have completely dumbed down and over-worded the little
quips. They've completely missed the point and this WILL impact the
connection w/ the viewers/fans.
Bummer. Mass marketers suck. I can say that because I used to be
one...
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Darryl,
I agree with you. That new image for the cover of America the
Beautiful is absolutely horrendous. I have no problem with conventional
beauty, but I wholeheartedly agree that to use that image is to support the
very things we criticize. I understand the the "conventionally
attractive" woman obviously does not need those cosmetic procedures, but
as a woman with an imperfect body, to me that image sends the message,
"Of course SHE doesn't need work done. Neither would I, if I looked like
her." As opposed to the film's amazing message of loving oneself
"as is."
I bought and loved the film, and I am glad to have a copy with
the original artwork. The way to help women begin to reclaim their own beauty
is not to objectify them on the cover of a movie. Thank you for taking a
stand on what is right!
---------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Darryl,
Wow. I can't believe they changed the artwork so fully! While I
can understand their view that some people will get pissy over the Statue
image (because you are going mainstream with the film, it is something to
consider), but it's a great image because it's what people associate with
America. And in this country, we have the fanatical obsession with looking
good. The fact it's a woman, who is strong, a leader, a beacon, in all her
natural glory, who then is being put to the "woman's perfect image"
test, I think is a fantastic portrayal of what your movie covers. I myself
wouldn't change the artwork at all. And, there are PLENTY of other films out
there destroying or defacing the Statue of Liberty, and no one seems to balk
at that. Their argument on that doesn't fly with me.
The woman THEY have placed on the cover has already been
airbrushed and chosen because of her gorgeousness, and is the very epitome of
what the film is trying to speak against. I would not pick it up. It is
hypocritical to place that woman on the cover. They are still selling the
image of the "perfect body" in order to sell your film! They even
say this:
4) The new art better utilizes the great satirical
concept at the center of your original idea...i.e. that the fashion
(etc.) industries make money by criticizing that which is essentially
flawless. The woman on the box is a standard beauty, but the fasionista
making the notes is essentially saying that she is ugly. Isn't this at
the core of your film? I think the essential message was confused by
the use of the Statue of Liberty, whose beauty is symbolic, not literal.
They are saying that this woman is flawless, thus leading the
consumer to once again be given images of the "perfect" body which
is not the norm. "The woman on the box is a standard beauty.."
WHAT? No, she is the standard model in the fashion world, which is just what
you are addressing in your film. I think THEY are the ones missing the point.
And then they say that Liberty herself isn't literally beautiful, only
symbolically. Hmmm....I'd take symbolic beauty any day. And there is MUCH
more to your film that what they say is the core. If they had watched it,
they would have seen that.
If they want to change the artwork, then take a NORMAL, average
size-14 women or average young woman, girl next door type, and put HER on the
cover with all the of the markings. Have it be someone we can ALL relate to -
our own daughter, mother, sister, friend. I don't relate to models being
further put to the fashionista's suggestions because she's already gone
through all that to look they way she looks!
Feel free to send this to your contacts there. Tell them I work
in publishing and DVD distribution, and this would just not fly if this had
been our project. I just goes against everything you make a case for in your
film, and I really can't believe that they would think the new artwork would
pass muster with you. I hope you retained the right to vote down artwork, and
that you can request some other versions to choose from.
Wow. I'm surprised how upset that got me!
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Darryl,
I am a psychotherapist who keeps a copy of your film in my
office to loan out to clients. I actually had one client lose 50 pounds
which she credits to your movie. The movie relieved her of her self-hatred,
which then resulted in her effortlessly ceasing to binge. It changed
her life. She is a new person now. If the DVD had had the new
bikini cover on it, I would have put it in a blank case and tossed the
cover. I do not allow images like that in my office or in my waiting
room. Your gut instinct is right on. The people who chose this cover
are brainwashed and are using the cheapest marketing technique in the
world: which is to make women feel inadequate so they will buy the
product in the hopes of becoming worthy. Unfortunately billions are made with
that approach. The Statue of Liberty is a brilliant cover. It's a thinking
woman's cover. American advertisers sell billions by tapping into self-hatred
and fear of inadequacy, the very things your film speaks out against.
It's a pure case of cross purposes. Your purpose: to make
a difference and change lives. The Hollywood DVD company's purpose:
CASH CASH CASH.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Darryl -
First, let me say that I'm thrilled your film is getting the
attention and distribution it so richly deserves. I first watched it in
a little tiny screening room in Chicago in 2007 with a handful of other folks
(from an ad you put on craigslist, no less!), and was blown away - I talked
about it nonstop for months after. I have so enjoyed watching this
film's success over the intervening years - and watching it (on DVD at home
now!) I'm still just as blown away as I was that very first screening.
To see this film that I find so important given the very
marketing treatment it's calling out - and then to have the distributor come
back in such an insulting manner - is beyond disappointing. Quite
frankly, as much as this film has been such a boon for those with eating disorders,
it's shocking that anyone would suggest marketing it under an image that -
satirical as it might be to some - could undoubtedly be taken very seriously
by someone seeing it though the lens of body dysmorphia. On top of
that, selling something through the use of a half-naked, stereotypically
beautiful woman? Really? That's the best they could come up with?
Personally, I love the Statue of Liberty artwork. I think
it perfectly represents the essence of the film, while not exploiting a
living woman (in a bikini or otherwise). In my opinion, the film isn't
just about beauty industry shenanigans, but also about how that impacts
American culture - which is why applying "beauty standards" to
maybe the most recognizable icon of American culture is a perfect fit.
I can understand, in our currently vicious political climate,
why marketers would be a little worried about sparking controversy when using
iconic symbols like the State of Liberty. I think, though, they should
give people - even the kind of people who might have extreme reactions to any
use of Lady Liberty outside her traditional context - a little credit for
recognizing the message. And, if they're just not willing to take that
risk (miniscule as I think it really is), then I challenge them to come up
with something that doesn't entirely miss the point of the film, and the
real-world effects of the practices it dissects.
I think it would be irresponsible, at the very least, to market
the film under that artwork. I hope you're able to convince the
distributor to reconsider. If not, you can be sure I will tell folks to
avoid buying the film in Borders or Blockbuster, and continue to order
directly from your website instead.
------------------------------------------
Hi Darryl,
A few quick things. First off, love the documentary and I have
loved being able to use in my work. I am licensed psychologist who works
closely with adolescents and adults struggling with eating disorders and body
image issues. I work both in private practice and at an eating disorders
treatment center.
Please, please, keep the Statue of Liberty on that box! The men
seem to be missing the key point when they point out the new image is a
"standard of beauty." The woman on the box is not the standard of
beauty at all and to perpetuate her as the standard of beauty is insulting to
the intent of your film. I highly doubt that image has not already been
retouched, etc. It seems as if they are trying to market the film to men
quite frankly. Boo!
Also, I agree with the need to use a registered dietitian with
good eating disorder experience and training in your new endeavor. There are
wonderful RD's all throughout this country who are working hard to demystify
the BMI and preach a clearer focus on health. Two of my favorites: Amanda
Bueller, RD/LD who was on a panel with you at the University of Texas-Austin
and Lea Gebhardt, RD/LD also in Austin, TX.
Good luck!
--------------------------------------------
Hi Darryl
I don't normally reply to your emails because I know you must
get hundreds, but I could not resist putting in my two cents about the new
cover and Blockbusters reply. First off, I was absolutely appalled by the new
cover. The skinny little model is as you said, no different than Ralph Lauren
advertising. But what made my mouth drop was in the reply to your letter when
they said: The woman on the box is a standard beauty, " !!!! Clearly,
the model has already been severely photoshooped, so it looks laughable that
those comments about further photoshopping are even there. And second,
whoever wrote that the model is "standard beauty" is just
demonstrating what your documentary is trying to change - that our society
views that type of photoshopped, meatless model as "standard
beauty"! I am on your side and am COMPLETELY against the new cover. At
the a absolute minimum, if you have to change the cover because of political
reasons, then they should suggest a NORMAL looking woman to be on the cover
with the photoshop comments, not one that has ALREADY been massacred and
looks fake to begin with!!!
Best of luck.
---------------------------------------------
Darryl,
Sorry, but I hate the new cover, and wouldn't buy it or rent it
if I saw it. I'm disappointed. There is no excuse, in my opinion. It's
triggering. The fact of the matter is that it leads us right back into the
entire issue...what society/culture says "looks good" and what will
sell. I don't buy their rationale, and frankly...would hope you wouldn't
stand for it just to sell the DVD. Did I miss something?
---------------------------------------------
Well Darryl,
I have to say I love the Statue of Liberty art a lot more than
the new version. Liberty represents all women, the new version
represents only white women. It doesn't mean it won't sell and those
that see it won't be as moved as those that saw it with the orginal
design. But I do think it takes away something when we 'white wash' an
artistic statement. Sorry to hear about it.
Regarding the dietician concern....I am currently serving as
president of The Association for Size Diversity and Health. We can
provide you with a lot of research and researchers, dieticians, etc that can
help you with your new film. Not only should we debunk the use of BMI
as a 'vital sign' (yes there is actual legislation now being considered to
make that happen) there are a lot of myths about the idea of health and
body size. I hope you explore our website and feel free to contact me
if you wish to discuss how we can help you.
----------------------------------------------
I can not believe this!! Well, maybe I can - just goes to
show you how messed up this world is. I have struggled with an eating
disorder for about 18 years - yes, I know, call me a screw up, a nobody, a
failure, a menice to society. But, Darell, when I first saw your film
in Fargo, ND, I was so touched. I actually found some hope in this
world. Your film is powerful and you have my support in a
boycott. Actually, I think this is what we should do and I challenge
everyone to participate: Create a note/cover/or something like it that
will cover the DVD's new cover and when anyone sees the new covered DVD in
the stores ----COVER IT!!!!!!
I am truly sorry this has happened. It is a shame. I
actually had hope, a reason to maybe keep on trying to battle my eating
disorder, but now, I am not so sure. Why do I waste even a second of my
time trying to get better? I don't want to live in this horrible
world. Maybe, just maybe, this eating disorder is God's way of
beckoning me home - TWISTED, by maybe.
Darell - thank you for your dedication to the cause. You
are an angel.
You have my support!!
------------------------------------------------
Hi Darryl,
Just wanted to respond to you on the latest glitch as to the
proposed dvd cover design. I always thought the current design was
brilliant and fit perfectly with the title and message of the film.
Just to think of reconstructing changes to the already perfect Statue of
Liberty sends a clear, defined and unspoken image message in itself as to how
ludicrous it is to even consider these common superficial cosmetic changes on
an already unflawed woman symbol of America's freedom and beauty and how that
message transfers to all women, no matter age or race, country or culture, as
the film delivers so effectively. The proposed dvd design suggestion is
so far off the mark and even cheapens and contradicts the film's high
standing message and purpose. I hope you can still run with what we have
had as a strong and outstanding symbol of the film going forward into the
next stage of dvd sales. The proposed cover isn't even close as an
option and the design lacks originality and character and doesn't distinguish
itself whatsoever from any other 'run of the mill' film devoid of substance.
In one word for this proposed design: Unfortunate.
-------------------------------------------------
Dear Daryl,
I was appalled at the response you revived from the distributer
regarding the so called "New Art Work". They just don't GET IT.
This woman should NOT BE the representative of what is ideal, for the very
fact the she is flawless. If they thought that they needed to use a real
person as their "ideal" at least they could have chosen a model
that looks like an average female human being and not an already air brushed,
make up laden, bikini clad, example of what we are trying to stop, which is
to have young girls who don't look like this attempt to achieve an
"unachievable perfection.'
These marketers are idiots!
-------------------------------------------------
Stand your ground!!! It's stupid to change it! Liberty is a
perfect fit for the face of the film and the meaning. Anything I can do
please advise!
-------------------------------------------------
Dear Darryl,
First - LOVE the Statue of Liberty cover - FAR superior to the
other one!!! These marketing people are in the OLD paradigm of life -
YOU are in the NEW paradigm!!! I have a copy of the Statue DVD - Lucky
Me!!
Second - the nutritionist vs. dietitian - you can find GREAT
people in either field. The MAIN thing is to look for - are those who
are on the cutting edge. There is SO much new information out there -
and whoever you talk with - needs to be OPEN and again, living in the NEW
paradigm!! I would seriously consider working with a Naturopathic
DR. - there are MANY here in the Portland, Oregon area and the NW in
general. THEY HAVE MANY hours of nutritional training, are doctors and
have a very deep knowledge of how diet/food/vitamins, etc. affect our bodies.
KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hey - is there going to be a screening in the Portland
area?
--------------------------------------------------
I just received the email with the copy of the new cover. I am
DISGUSTED to say the least. Doesn't that cover go against everything America
the Beautiful stands for??!!?? Are you actually going to let them market the
dvd like this? I am beyond disgusted. If it is marketed with the new cover-
you lose your credibility with women everywhere. Thank you for all that you
do for the cause. I hope that yu take a stand against the dvd company.
----------------------------------------------------
Dear Darryl:
I understand your situation.
It is hard to let go of your "baby" and it's
perception in your mind. Although I like the original cover, the second
one is not bad.
If the distributors are willing to "invest" in the new
design, let them give it a try. If nothing else, you will have two ways
to sell your product.
Just a thought.
------------------------------------------------------
I wanted to take a moment and contact you in regards to the new
DVD art. I'm a member of the Body Positive Dance team that was
instrumental in bringing you and your amazing film to Austin and - in my mind
- that version of the cover goes against everything that your film and our
dance troupe are trying to do. Calling ANY woman ugly is insulting to
the entire human race in my mind.
The appeal, in my eyes, of the original cover was that the
Statue of Liberty - while a well known and recognizable icon - is not an
actual woman. Nothing negative was being said about an actual
person. The new art takes a real woman - lovely, as we all are - and
tacks negative messages on to her. We all are surrounded by these on a
daily basis - hence your film - so seeing someone else tagged with them is
not helpful.
If they really feel that new art is necessary, perhaps they
could give the Venus d'Milo or Mona Lisa a similar treatment to that which
the Statue of Liberty originally was treated. This would provide new
art, could be made to "pop", but would not carry on the negative
stereotypes that we are all working so hard to defeat.
Clearly this is just my opinion and should be taken as
such. However, I hope that it provides some useful ideas and let's you
know that I support your fight against the new art.
Sincerely and gratefully,
Gwen Way
----------------------------------------------------
The new artwork is absolutely ridiculous and once again it's the
media telling us what the standard of beauty is. To say this stick thin model
on the cover "literal" beauty is saying that we are only allowed to
say it's appauling when girls who look like this are criticized when 98
percent of women don't actually look like that. UGH!!!
Don't let them do it Darryl!!!
----------------------------------------------------
OK. I do love the statue of Liberty poster,
However, from a marketing perspective- I am leaning
towards agreeing with them.
A fresh approach wouldn't hurt. I saw the cover as
"satirical" because the model needed none of those treatments,
just all women are beautiful with out all that.
I think you should lean towards their expertise.....
-----------------------------------------------------
Dear Darryl,
I just saw the new cover and the response about why it is more
marketable. I agree. I think the obvious photoshopping comments on a flawless
beauty will slap potential viewers with the satire. You know middle America
can be very sensitive, so don't feel too bad about the change. Hopefully, you
will not have to make any more sacrifices.
------------------------------------------------------
Greetings Darryl,
In my opinion, changing the DVD box cover is, first and
foremost, in bad taste. Yes, I see the irony that the distributors are trying
to play on, but it's bland and, to be honest, common.
The film is called America the Beautiful. What could be more
iconic than the Statue of Liberty? And using Lady Liberty in such a way plays
to a sub-text of America, as a nation, having issues related to beauty
standards. Using some model in a blue polka-dot bikini totally squashes the
message of the sub-text.
Our whole nation needs help in seeing the beauty in everyone,
even themselves.
So yes, I would boycott the change and would direct friends to
do so as well. If you plan to keep offering the original DVD on your website
I will direct friends there instead.
If you wish, I can assist in starting a letter writing campaign
to the DVD company who is insisting on the change. Perhaps the words of many
people can help change their minds.
At Your Service,
-------------------------------------------------------
I see both sides of the DVD cover issue however in the long run
I agree with you that the initial image of the DVD box communicates a
sexualized image of women - before you ever get a chance to read the text.
While the 'concept' is similar to the initial design I don't think women will
want to pick up the DVD at first glance. Is it possible to compromise with a
close up shot of the woman's face or something like that?
Stay true to your vision and values my friend. I know this is a
tough spot to be in.
-------------------------------------------------------
Dear Darryl,
I am a mental health therapist specializing in eating disorders
in Portland, Oregon. I have watched your movie and loved it and have been
receiving and reading your emails since. I appreciate the work you are
doing and look forward to more!
I often have responses to your emails that only remain in my own
head. This is the first time I was compelled enough to write in response to
both topics you address in this email.
I completely agree with your outrage about the new cover for
your movie. The Statue of Liberty symbolizes what you have suggested for your
film but also she is America. There are many people who we have deemed as
less than American, historically and currently - blacks,
homosexuals, etc, and now fat people. This is the reason I liked
your cover so much. It reminds us that all Americans are worthy of being
fully American... no matter his or her size, race, religion, etc. The
new cover not only dismisses the larger woman but continues to
devalue her.
Please keep your original cover wherever you can!
-------------------------------------------------------
Dear Darrell,
I have very mixed feelings about the new, proposed artwork. Yes,
it will likely sell more copies, which, in the end, is arguably most
important (for the viewing numbers rather than for the money-making, of
course). However, it plays into the same game that toys with women's and
girls' (and men's and boys') self-esteem. I love all the things that the
original artwork stands for, but I can also appreciate the concerns about the
patriotic factor and the visual impact factor. I cannot say I'm completely
opposed to the new artwork because I think the juxtaposition of the
"stereotypical beauty" and the critical words is meaningful and
conveys part of the documentary's message. However, I also feel like the
criticisms on the cover appear cruel and even verbally violent, so I am
saddened by the image in that regard. Somehow, the overall image continues to
look appealing and beautiful instead of painful and cruel, which seems
saddeningly tragic, given the harshness of the words.
Thank you for passing along the information on this issue to
your email list. As always, I appreciate your critical thinking regarding the
larger American culture and its effects on its people.
--------------------------------------------------------
HI Darryl, I'm with you. The new art work is just another
picture prefect, sexy body that 90% of real women can not live up to.. Thanks
for standing your ground on this issue. But I understand that the media wants
to make more money off the DVD and off women, nothing new. I'm glad I bought
the original versus.
----------------------------------------------------------
Hi Darryl,
First, thank you!!! Thank you for standing up to those "in
the industry" in regards to the new movie cover. I find the new cover to
be a disgrace and quite frankly, I am not sure that he watched the film. What
is so clever and beautiful about your design is that an iconic, American
piece of art is being "nip and tucked." Many ask why would you
change something that is so beautiful as is? But, for some odd reason, people
don't have that same sentiment when it comes to our own bodies. I will fight
with you about this new cover.
Lastly, I have to second someone's suggestion of Ellyn Satter as
well as Evelyn Tribole and Elyse Resch. What a novel and comforting approach
they take to nutrition.
Thank you again! You rock!
-----------------------------------------------------------
Hi Darryl,
Regarding the new "look" I am in total agreement with
you! That cover looks like any Cosmo, Glamour, or whatever magazine
that is out there. There is absolutely no purpose being served to
change what is a very clever and eye catching cover to a basically
"generic" (since we all see this daily) one. Stay the course.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Hello. I work in corporate communications and am a big fan of
your film. I wanted to reply to your question about the new DVD artwork. I
agree with you that it is COMPLETELY ridiculous! Honestly, my first thought
is that the new proposal makes your fabulous documentary look like a cheesy
porno film. The whole point of the Liberty artwork is that you are saying
that just as we shouldn't mess with the natural beauty of Lady Liberty, nor
should be mess with the natural beauty of any girl or woman.
It is EXACTLY because LADY LIBERTY is an image that is not to be
touched that the image resonates as thought-provoking.It is the *implied*
disrespect of even thinking of messing with a national treasue that resonates
- I do not pereceive any disrepect in the actual use of the image
itself...but am absolutely offended by the stereotype of the new image (not
to mention the condescion of the executive whose email you provided).
I wish you the best of luck with the ongoing promotion of the
film - and I'm glad I've already purchased a copy with the original artwork
:) Keep fighting the good fight!...
------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Darryl,
You are doing fantastic work with a great film: American the
Beautiful. I completely agree with your text in your message below concerning
your use of the Statue of Liberty along with your written modifications on
that image. Like you express, I am shocked that the movie distribution
industry would change the cover as well, in my opinion, including their
including several words of advertising/endorsement text ("funny,
shocking, enlightening"), that overall then seems together to express a
significantly different and significantly light-hearted/less serious message
that your movie and that you have worked hard and successfully to communicate
to many. Accordingly, I disagree with the reply comments that were sent to
you, including the two paragraphs that I have quoted immediately below:
4) The new art better utilizes the great satirical concept at
the center of your original idea...i.e. that the fashion (etc.) industries
make money by criticizing that which is essentially flawless. The woman on
the box is a standard beauty, but the fasionista making the notes is
essentially saying that she is ugly. Isn't this at the core of your film? I
think the essential message was confused by the use of the Statue of Liberty,
whose beauty is symbolic, not literal.
In other words, we are (as with your original artwork and film
itself) calling the degrading practices of the beauty industry absurd and
wrong. In my humble opinion anyone that would boycott this based on the new
art simply doesn't get the real point of the film.
Best wishes to you, your intent, and your continuing
accomplishments that disseminate your important and serious message.
---------------------------------------------
The new art work is not satirical in my opinion; it is offensive
and does no justice at all to the quality or message of the film. How better
to show the dis-connection between the natural human body and media driven
cultural expectations for beauty than to use a cultural icon. They would have
been better off to use a lovely, healthy toddler aged child or find a
non-celebrity yet culturally linked recognizable person as the model. I
woulod be embarrassed to show that cover in my classroom except as an example
of multi-layerd social oppression and injustice.
-----------------------------
I agree with your disappointment. I wouldn't buy the new edition
of the DVD with the new cover. It seems contradictory to the essence of your
film. I don't think that the model on the cover represents the women that are
portrayed in the movie. I think the cover is disappointing to those of us
that identify with your documentary. Please do all that is possible (if it
still is) to stop this edition from hitting the major stores.
You are an inspiration. Thanks,
-----------------------------------
Hi Darryl,
That new "improved"poster does no justice to your
beautiful film and I resent the fact they chose a skinny, blonde, caucasian
woman. The LIBERTY model represents all of us from all geographic
origins.
---------------------------------------------
Is there a way to stop them from changing your art? Not only is
the bikini version they are suggesting offensive, I think it's also
potentially triggering for women dealing with eating disorders, body
dysmorphia and other issues. How disappointing that they can't leave your
great work alone to stand by itself.
-----------------------------------------
This from a male producer at CNN News:
Hey! I LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Provocative! Eye-catching! Can actually, it makes the point more
clearly that Lady Liberty. Liberty is certainly more creative. But sometimes,
the direct approach works. I think you're too close to the project. Be a good
boss and let good people do their job.
-------------------------------------------------
- UPCOMING SCREENINGS
Here is a partial list of some of the screenings set up
for 2010. I will be at all of the screenings listed below and conducting a
Q&A afterwards. I will list additional screenings as they become
available:
May 17, 2010 - Naperville, IL
Speaking at the Linden Oaks Candlelight Vigil
May 25, 2010 - Manhattan, NY
Hosting Fashion Show and Auction for ROAED
June 11,2010 - Tempe, AZ
MAJOR Remuda Ranch Screening
July 28, 2010 - Atlanta, GA
September 20, 2010 - St. Cloud, Minnesota
Behavioral Health Clinic
September 27, 2010 - Boone, North Carolina
Appalachian State University
September 29, 2010 - Northbrook, IL
Screening for the North Surburban Parents of IL
October 1, 2010 - Chicago, IL
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Meeting Screening
|
